A pre-committed operational charter · v2.0
| Document | Falsifiability Protocol · Locked Operational Charter |
| Version | 2.0 — adds the Operator Fidelity Layer to the v1.0 edge charter |
| Reference | FP-V2-2026-05 |
| Strategy | Ekantik Trading Strategy · ES / MES Futures |
| Issuing entity | Ekantik Capital Advisors LLC · Maple Grove, MN |
| Date locked | ____ May 2026 |
| Distribution | Public · accelerator.ekantikcapital.com |
Every credible system pre-defines the conditions under which it admits failure. Most trading operations do not. This one defines two — and runs them in parallel.
The v1.0 charter defined the Expression Layer: the precise statistical threshold at which the operator agrees the edge is dead, the stand-down sequence, and the re-deployment gate (Articles I–IV, retained below). v2.0 adds the Fidelity Layer: the criteria under which the operator admits the published method is not what is actually running — independent of whether the edge itself is sound.
The two layers are bound by a single interpretation rule. The edge cannot be declared falsified using data produced while transmission fidelity is in breach. Both layers are reported on the public page in real time.
Expression-Layer (Edge Gate) firings while a Fidelity-Layer Tier 2 or Tier 3 breach is active in the rolling 30-day window are interpretation-suspended pending operator remediation. The edge cannot be declared falsified from data generated during a known transmission-fidelity breach.
The operator agrees to declare the edge statistically dead upon satisfaction of the following condition:
Realized expectancy across rolling 100 qualified trades drops to $0 per trade — the edge becomes net-negative.
Evaluated continuously; the trigger is satisfied at the close of the trade that first brings rolling-100 expectancy to zero or below. A qualified trade is one entered and exited under all operative documented rules, unaffected by execution error, platform malfunction, or extraordinary market event.
$0 is the cleanest falsifiability bar: the strategy stands down when, and only when, it is no longer producing positive expectancy. A threshold above zero would trip on ordinary variance from any working edge. The 100-trade window’s standard error (≈$30) places $0 roughly 2.2 SE below the documented live expectancy — statistical evidence of collapse, not noise.
Upon trigger satisfaction, immediately and without exception:
The strategy does not return to live deployment until all three conditions are satisfied:
Stand-down requires only evidence the edge crossed into net-negative territory ($0). Re-deployment requires evidence of meaningfully positive expectancy (+$50). Quick to fail; slow to forgive.
Any modification to this protocol — thresholds, window sizes, action steps, re-deployment criteria, cool-off periods, or any Fidelity-Layer criterion — is subject to:
Is the published method what is actually running? Each criterion is pre-committed, observable, binary-checkable, and time-bounded — mapping to a distinct layer of operator fidelity: cognitive, structural, substrate.
Every qualified trade receives an operator attribution tag — H2 (process breached) or H3 (variance) — logged before the next entry, against a pre-decision log (rationale, expected outcome, frozen-process checklist). H3 is the resting attribution; H2 is the exception. H1 (edge failed) is not an operator attribution and is never applied to a single trade. "Edge failed" is a verdict about the strategy, knowable only across a sample — so it is system-derived: H1 is declared solely by the Expression Gate's rolling-100 realized-expectancy verdict (the "pattern across N events"), subject to the Binding Interpretation Rule. H1 is locked out at the per-trade level by design.
Breach: tag missing at next entry · tag inconsistent with pre-decision log · H1 hand-applied to a trade (the per-trade verdict belongs to the gate, not the operator). Threshold: zero breaches inside rolling 100-trade window. Verification: witness audits the attribution log monthly.
Zero unannounced or witness-uncountersigned protocol modifications inside the rolling window, per the Article IV four-step protocol. Breach: any modification executed without the four steps. Threshold: binary — zero breaches, period. Verification: witness countersignature artifact retrievable per modification.
Three pre-committed daily components, filed before market open:
Breach: adherence below 95% across any rolling 30 trading days. Threshold: ≥ 95% completion across rolling 30 days. Verification: witness reviews the adherence log monthly; below-threshold weeks require written explanation.
| Tier | Trigger | Response | Resume |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Logged breach | Single isolated breach of Criterion 01 or 03. | Logged within 24h + Discord entry. Witness review within 7 days, written corrective action. Stage-1 counter resets to zero. No size/operational change. | Immediate; counter restarts at zero. |
| T2 Conditions reduced | 3+ breaches of Criterion 01/03 in rolling 30 trades, or sustained Criterion 03 below 95% across rolling 30 days. | Position cut to minimum (1 MES, no scaling, no ES) for next 20 qualified trades. Daily filing under witness oversight. Counter resets. Trading continues at reduced conditions. | 20 clean minimum-size trades + witness countersignature. |
| T3 Full cessation | Any Criterion 02 breach, or a second T2 inside rolling 100 trades. | Immediate cessation; new entries → zero next session; open positions exit per plan. Discord entry within 24h with breach, structural cause, remediation pathway. Witness convenes structural review. Protocol update if breach revealed structural inadequacy. | Witness-countersigned remediation artifact + 30-day calendar gap + 20 minimum-size trades. |
The named witness for this protocol is Manish Dharod, who holds authority over: modification approvals (Article IV), breach tier classifications (Article VI), and Stage-1 resumption events (T2/T3). The witness signs that protocol was followed; the witness does not endorse the substance of any decision or modification.
witness-audits.json. Without the monthly artifact, the "witness reviews monthly" claim is itself in breach.Hiren Desai · Founder & Chief Investment Officer · Ekantik Capital Advisors LLC
By signature, the operator attests this protocol was derived prior to the deployment of member capital and is hereby locked as the governing operational charter. Witness signature attests only that the modification protocol was followed.